|
|


Re: 6 eggs 7 babies
Posted by to My Tukkus on 1/13/09
On 1/12/09, Well La Ti Da wrote: > On 1/12/09, Rick wrote: >> This interesting thread has become quite trivial due to your >> unintentional abbreviated "Rosies". So if you wouldn't mind >> clearing the air with the type of Rosies you are referring so >> others can then agree / disagree and offer more intellect. I have >> always been told you shouldn't assume anything. I think you know >> where I am headed with this. Good luck with the babies. > > > Well, aren't you the surly little snip! Who appointed you director > of the cruise ship's entertainment? > Intellect, my tukkus. Don't be upset, My Tukkus. Maybe you should have posted the response, then you can be director of the cruise ship's entertainment. Don't be a hater! LOL. Silly people.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- 6 eggs 7 babies, 1/01/09, by Tim.
- Re: 6 eggs 7 babies, 1/02/09, by Glenda.
- Re: 6 eggs 7 babies, 1/02/09, by Tim.
- Re: 6 eggs 7 babies, 1/08/09, by Gina.
- Re: 6 eggs 7 babies...HELLO???GINA ???, 1/10/09, by Amazed.
- Re: 6 eggs 7 babies...HELLO???GINA ???, 1/10/09, by petra.
- Re: 6 eggs 7 babies...HELLO???GINA ???, 1/11/09, by Says you.
- Re: 6 eggs 7 babies, 1/12/09, by Rick.
- Re: 6 eggs 7 babies, 1/12/09, by Tim.
- Re: 6 eggs 7 babies, 1/12/09, by Well La Ti Da.
- Re: 6 eggs 7 babies, 1/13/09, by Rick.
- Re: 6 eggs 7 babies, 1/13/09, by to My Tukkus.
- Re: 6 eggs 7 babies, 2/06/09, by C.J..
|