|
|


Re: white quakers
Posted by MKay on 1/05/06
Yes, Greyman, I know what line breeding is. I understand that technically, it is the same, but the approach taken is not half- hazard or irresponsible. Inbreeding is a result of careless, selfish, dangerous indulgences. Inbreeding produces unwelcomed mutations and deformities, and grotesque abmormalities whether they are immediately visible or passed on to the next offspring. Inbreeding is the subject of many-a-self-proclaimed-comics. Linebreeding (in my humble opinion) is defined as such when careful consideration has been made to continue working with certain characteristics or traits, documented and followed by the RESPONSIBLE parties. Now, just any Mo,Dick or Harry can call it line breeding when they pair what they pair, but there is no doubt that Mr. Nemerovsky and Mr. Davey are two educated, experienced breeders who's names should not be dragged through someone else's muddied crops.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- white quakers , 1/02/06, by abby.
- Re: white quakers , 1/02/06, by Dee.
- Re: white quakers , 1/03/06, by LindaC in OK.
- Re: white quakers , 1/03/06, by abby.
- Re: white quakers , 1/03/06, by abby.
- Re: white quakers , 1/03/06, by Dee.
- Re: white quakers , 1/04/06, by MKay.
- Re: white quakers /Excuse me ?, 1/04/06, by LindaC in OK.
- Re: white quakers /Excuse me ?, 1/04/06, by abby.
- Re: white quakers /abby, 1/05/06, by LindaC in OK.
- Re: white quakers , 1/05/06, by Greyman.
- Re: white quakers , 1/05/06, by MKay.
- Re: white quakers , 1/06/06, by LindaC in OK.
- Re: white quakers , 6/19/06, by Tiffany.
- Re: white quakers , 6/19/06, by LindaC in OK.
- Re: white quakers , 11/27/06, by Laura.
- Re: white quakers , 11/27/06, by observer.
- Re: white quakers , 11/27/06, by laura.
- Re: white quakers , 11/27/06, by Regina.
|